Republicans in Congress apparently decided not to put up too much of a fuss over Obama's first judicial nominee on the basis of her race. Never mind the completely rational reasons for opposing her, let's just quit now. Sotomayor has been overturned by the US Supreme Court at least eight times. She has no more clear view on the law than I do despite her JD and her years of experience. She did not fight her way from poverty to achievemet; her parents did that when they immigrated here.
I oppose Sotomayor on the auspices that she is incompetant, incorrect, and incorrigible. It has nothing to do with her race. I oppose he with the same vehement defiance with which I oppose Schumer, Reid, Pelosi, Kennedy, and scores of others.
She shows no respect for the oath she took or the stewardship she carries. Her rulings demonstrate a complete lack of fidelity to the constitution. Her conduct desmonstrates how much she despises a big swath of the population...on the auspices of her race and genitalia she can be a better judge than I. The vast majority of Americans are not racists, but she is, and she hates you if you aren't exactly what she is. Like all mass Movements, she wants you to hate the borgeoise, which is nothing more than whatever Marxists hate.
In 2006, when I went to take the CBP examination in Las Vegas, I met a man from Peru. He spoke to me during the break between sections of the test. He wondered aloud at all the people who come to this nation and denigrate our laws and defy our traditions. After seeing so many from neighboring cultures blatantly disregard the law, he left construction to pursue a life in law enforcement. I have a great deal of respect for him and hope he is succeeding.
I worry however that my friend will face opposition from people like Sotomayor. Two CBP agents served time for shooting but not killing a known narcotics trafficker. What will she do, his culture and heritage notwithstanding? It's not about race. It's about predominant philosophical ideology, and hers is quite frankly racist, bigoted, and socialist-radical-envirostatist, making her an enemy of the Constitution.
As for members of the Senate who have promised not to oppose her, shame on you. Stop cowtowing to the white guilt that says we cannot oppose someone of another race. Dr. King would roll over in his grave. This is not about race; it is about substance. Her character is not of the sort that we want on the Supreme Court. Se cannot, she will not keep fidelity to its precepts and principles; the content of her court work clearly delineates that as fact.
If I am going to be damned, I might as well be damned for what I am. If we're going to lose, let us lose on principle. The battle cannot be won if you quit before it starts. Don't give up until you have no other choice. If you're going to hold what I say against me, then you sure as shooting better hold what she says against her.
I oppose Sotomayor on the auspices that she is incompetant, incorrect, and incorrigible. It has nothing to do with her race. I oppose he with the same vehement defiance with which I oppose Schumer, Reid, Pelosi, Kennedy, and scores of others.
She shows no respect for the oath she took or the stewardship she carries. Her rulings demonstrate a complete lack of fidelity to the constitution. Her conduct desmonstrates how much she despises a big swath of the population...on the auspices of her race and genitalia she can be a better judge than I. The vast majority of Americans are not racists, but she is, and she hates you if you aren't exactly what she is. Like all mass Movements, she wants you to hate the borgeoise, which is nothing more than whatever Marxists hate.
In 2006, when I went to take the CBP examination in Las Vegas, I met a man from Peru. He spoke to me during the break between sections of the test. He wondered aloud at all the people who come to this nation and denigrate our laws and defy our traditions. After seeing so many from neighboring cultures blatantly disregard the law, he left construction to pursue a life in law enforcement. I have a great deal of respect for him and hope he is succeeding.
I worry however that my friend will face opposition from people like Sotomayor. Two CBP agents served time for shooting but not killing a known narcotics trafficker. What will she do, his culture and heritage notwithstanding? It's not about race. It's about predominant philosophical ideology, and hers is quite frankly racist, bigoted, and socialist-radical-envirostatist, making her an enemy of the Constitution.
As for members of the Senate who have promised not to oppose her, shame on you. Stop cowtowing to the white guilt that says we cannot oppose someone of another race. Dr. King would roll over in his grave. This is not about race; it is about substance. Her character is not of the sort that we want on the Supreme Court. Se cannot, she will not keep fidelity to its precepts and principles; the content of her court work clearly delineates that as fact.
If I am going to be damned, I might as well be damned for what I am. If we're going to lose, let us lose on principle. The battle cannot be won if you quit before it starts. Don't give up until you have no other choice. If you're going to hold what I say against me, then you sure as shooting better hold what she says against her.
No comments:
Post a Comment