31 March 2009

We're In Good Company

Share
Sometimes people who agree with me feel afraid to share their opinions. The media have us believe that most of America (60%) supports the President and that conservative ideas are outdated. Many of the things I choose to tackle are considered controversial, and so people don't want to alienate friends or lose connections.

However, the more I read, the more I come across extremely controversial ideas put forth by great thinkers who in general agree with me. We Conservatives share our ideas with Bastiat, von Mises, Smith, Locke, Montesquieu, Adams, Jefferson, Plato, Cicero, Moses, etc. Our ideas are time-tested and shared with people whose names are not unknown to the world.

The Envirostatists yell very loudly that we are wrong. Who's on their side? Marx, Lenin, Trotzky, Nero, Hitler, Mousollini, Putin, Castro, etc?

We are in the right.

A man may be known by the company he keeps. We share our ideas and ideals with the greatest thinkers and philosophers of all time. There is nothing wrong with us.

30 March 2009

Truth in the Darkness

Share
While looking back through my pictures from DC, I found this one that I wish to make one of my campaign slogans, special thanks to IKEA furniture. I didn't expect to find such an indelible truth like this in the shadow of the Obama inauguration...

Photobucket


Like it or not, if we want to fix this country, it must begin in the home of every good American. Years ago in a radio address, a great American, President Ronald Reagan, said this:

All great change in America begins at the dinner table. So, tomorrow night in the kitchen I hope the talking begins. And children, if your parents haven't been teaching you what it means to be an American, let 'em know and nail 'em on it. That would be a very American thing to do.

If we are going to change the direction America is headed, it must begin in the home, with the rising generation. I was talking to a friend earlier who asked me if I was ready to bring children into this world, and I asked her if she could think of any better man than I to birth children into this world. Yes, there is work. Yes, there is heartache. Yes, there are rewards. My life is testament to the rewards of a life of virtue.

The girls of which I lately wrote are being taught the wrong things in their lives. They are probably not being corrected at the dinner table. Many parents turn their kids over to Wii and TV to babysit and entertain their children instead of seeing to their responsibility to raise up virtuous men and women of character.

Instead of going home and paying homage to the paper, House, CSI, and the like, entertaining though they may be, I urge Americans to make an investment in the intellectual heritage of this nation and take the reigns of education in their families. Remember that tyranny is built from the top down. Liberty begins at home. That's where values are learned. Don't make them wait 20 years to come to a person such as I in a classroom who has to turn back 20 years of ignorance in a paltry 33 hours maximum of class time during the semester. There's only so much I can do.


This image is proprietary, but the theme is copyright of IKEA Corp.

29 March 2009

Dangers of Climate Change Legislation

Share
Last night I overheard some teenage girls making a ruckass during the Hour of Darkness garbage proposed for 830PM Saturday night. They stood adjacent to a freeway overpass, and they were trying somehow to "inspire" drivers on the freeway to heed this asinine event. For several reasons I took occassion to their ignorance and decided to comment on the banality of their exercise in futility.

Their encouragement took the form of cursing and cadjolling. Instead of giving people a positive reason to participate, advocates of this event will as these girls result to personal attacks and profanity against those who choose not to participate.


Ironically, the target audience of their efforts cannot possibly acquiesce to their request as they drive down the freeway with their lights on. Obviously ignorant of the dangers, these girls stood alongside the freeway asking drivers to turn their lights off at night on the freeway. If the girls weren't careful, they could have been killed. If the girls were successful, they might have occassioned the death of someone else.

Fact of the matter is, these girls were obviously ignorant of the minute impact they were having on the whole. What hubris of man to assume that he can change the climate of a world much more complex and powerful than he. We can't predict the weather a week ahead of time; how can we predict climate as a whole next year, next century, or millenia hence? How can we alter it? Outside of the microcosm of a small experimental cylinder, we cannot control anything, and the little bit of difference a single person's reduction in use might exert on the earth as a whole is statistically significant. Do you know how many more coyotes, pronghorn, desert tortoises, and the like could be killed by motorists on NV roadways on any given night if motorists drove around with their lights off?


People want to feel like they're doing something that matters, so they sign up when Hollywood starlets and rich CEOs from WWF, the Sierra Club, and other organizations endorse something. However, these people don't actually do anything to change the world. They pretend for a living, or in the latter cases, they convince other people to do it themselves. Most of them would never roll up their sleeves to muck out a stable or help an old lady change a flat. They want you to do the work, to pay the costs, to fit the bill, and give them the credit.


In the end, the irony is that if we don't use the energy someone else will. If we don't burn the oil and coal, China will, and they have zero environmental controls and regulations in place which means that if other countries burn the fossil fuels, there will be MORE total pollution than if they were burned in our country, fewer American jobs, and more suffering in general in the world. Listening to Hollywood starlets who PRETEND to do something all day instead of actually contributing to society will not deliver us to the promised panacea. These people say whatever their employers tell them to. They work for the highest bidder. They are, in other words, paid to lie.


Don't change society for a lie. Don't pass dangerous laws predicated on half truths and whole lies. There's too much danger to risk that.

27 March 2009

They Say They Want Balance...

Share
Today I was listening to how Bobby Jindal governor of Louisiana signed a bill into law that allows creationism to be taught in schools. Some people are really outraged by this. How dare we possibly do anything they don't want, but when they want something we don't want, we're being "unreasonable", "radical", "intolerant", "selfish", etc.

This bill did not replace evolution with intelligent design. They still teach both in LA schools. We do not overwrite their views in favor of our own matrix, but that's what Envirostatists want to do. They cannot abide alternative viewpoints. Conservatives don't care if both views are presented; there's nothing wrong with that, but the Envirostatist must have his propaganda proselytized exclusively or it's not "fair".

Quite frankly, many things that we have permitted in the educational bastions of statism don't belong. Crap science like global warming doesn't belong. We need to stop teaching Ebonics and Spanish versions of classes to encourage people to assimilate since the common language is English and the common currency is the Dollar.


When the Envirostatist stand up for their agenda, they mash their opponents into the ground. For them, although they want coexistance with nature, there can be no coexistance with alternative views. They attempt to make their enemies look weird, narrow-minded, and bigoted when in reality their opponents are the exact opposite because they consider allowing those things to comingle with their own ideology. Conservatives are all about live and let live.

For socialists in America, there is no real choice. It's a lot like Disney's version of Peter Pan where Hook's crew tells Wendy to join the crew. "You'll love the life of a thief, you'll cherish the life of a crook. There isn't a boy who won't enjoy working for Captain Hook..." In that story, there was a "choice": join the crew, or walk the plank. That's how the Statist operates. Choose to join us or die. Henry Ford first phrased this ironic state of affairs well when he told automobile purchaseers: "You can have a Model T in any color as long as it's black." But color is another story entirely...

26 March 2009

Hail! Seizer!

Share
Since my mind works weird with words, I often hear things incorrectly. My sister probably remembers when I thought Celine Dion was singing, "Steal the Wine" instead of "Still the One". As a result, today I had an interesting thought that segued well to the topic in mind.

Lately, I've been thinking a lot about Rome as part of my reading of Montesquieu's The Spirit of the Laws. I think it's Part 3 where he talks about the Roman Republic, and of course as a result I think about gladiators, baths, and Ceasar. The president was saying something yesterday, and I found myself saying, "Hail Ceasar" when I lighted upon another thought. Obama is the Great Seizer- he will take anything and everything from anyone and everyone.

Despite his massive wealth, he donates less than 1% to charity. His brothers still live in poverty, and I heard his aunt is about to get deported. He has great
health care, school choice, and a black limosine. He just doesn't want YOU to have those things. We should give them our treasure, pay reparations, because we suck and need to apologize for what we have done to the rest of the world. If only government had more of our money, they could use it far better that we could (unless you're Tom Daschle). Obama wants to cut back on emissions which has and will continue to result in layoffs at automobile plants, steel factories, and coal mines, even though those people voted for them.

I saw the old version of the Manchurian Candidate the other day, and one scene really hit home. The Chinese guy, while plotting the overthrow of Western society, talks about how he's headed to Macy's to shop for his wife. Once he gets his way and America goes socialist, such a notion would no longer be possible. They despise our society in the midst of profitting therefrom.


Pretty soon, we'll all be marching around in crisply ironed brown shirts like the Hitler Youth. Beware the dyes and starch!

25 March 2009

Inspired by Watson and Crick

Share
I just finished reading James Watson's memoirs of his discovery of the double helix structure of DNA. As a result, in class this week, I was able to comment on some of the main tenants of science, as well as what appeared to be the take home message of Watson's having written this memoir.

Many people don't like Watson. I had a few students who didn't, and I know that a while back when he claimed that blacks were intellectually inferior they took away his Nobel Prize. Obviously, they have never read his book. Hardly a single coherant sentence escapes their mouths before they begin assaulting the character of the man instead of arguing against his substantive scientific argument.

Aside from the science for which I recommend this work I also encourage it because it taught me the following lesson that I underscored to my students:

Don't let anyone dissuade you from what you know to be right.



Watson didn't know how he knew. He didn't know why he was right. By degrees, he came to that knowledge. All of his colleagues told him he was barking up the wrong tree. Rosalynd Franklin adamantly held her position that the crystal structures didn't support his assumptions. In the end, they DO support the final model.

Stand fast in your values. Stop listening to uneducated yapping dogs who don't know much about History, don't know much Trigonometry, don't know much about Science book, don't know much about the French they took... As you grow in knowledge and experience, you will find the strength to weather the tide and do great things. I was inspired, and I know you will be too.

24 March 2009

All For One and More For Me

Share
Just before my jog this morning I got some distressing and irritating news. The good result is that I ran my 10K in 52 minutes. The bad news is that if Geithner and Obama get their way, they will have lain the foundation for the death of the western world.

Note the language of the article. He SEEKS POWER to SEIZE. So, he admits he does not have the power or the right, and he would have to seize, or take forceably. Where in Sam Houston did he get the idea that he can take power unto himself? Government gets its power from the people, and I don't know about you but I don't have power, despite the stock shares I own, to force any company into federal receivership. There is zero constitutional authority to do this.

King Obama I, this idiot, thinks that just because he defeated McCain in 2008 that he now has power and brains to run everything everywhere better than anyone anywhere despite lacking any evidence in support thereof. He has never run anything successfully, not even a presidential campaign. He won because McCain was lousy, not because he was good. Obama doesn't have a degree or any practical experience in any field except for his law degree, but all of that changed last November when he suddenly became clairevoyant upon election to the presidency. All he does well is party and nationalize industry. Shoot, even I can bowl higher than 129.

The NEvada Highway Patrol turned me away because I lacked a degree in criminal justice. Yet the president, bereft of any experience or education in business, wants us to think he can do anything we can do better. That about sums up the argument of what Mark Levin refers to as Envirostatists. He believes in government.

Obviously, Obama has never read Montesquieu. Montesquieu, from whom the Founding Fathers took much of the framework for our Federal Republic reminds us that the created is never greater than the creator. Perhaps that's why Envirostatists are also generally atheists, agnostics, and environmentalists- in those religions, THEY are gods unto themselves, but I digress.

Last Spring, I went to William Penn's home. There, I read the following:

Governments, like clocks, go from the motion men give them; and as governments are made and moved by men, so by them are ruined too. Wherefore governments rather depend upon men, than men upon governments. Let men be good, and the government cannot be bad; if it be ill, they will cure it. But, if men be bad, let the government be never so good, they will endeavor to warp and spoil it to their turn.

Government is spoiled. Obama will ruin your life. People in industries who voted for Obama will suffer under spread misery of a concerted effort to control men and make them poorer. You are not real to Envirostatists. You are a disease. If you succeed, you are a cancer to communism. They will march on listening to what they want to hear regardless of its truth. They will put coal miners, steel workers, automobile assemblymen, ad infinitum out of work, in the middle of a recession and take that as license to nationalize everything they can.

Obama and his ilk are wrong. They are idiots. Their lust for power cannot be slaked. God save us.

Next year, every one of you needs to become an American Aristocrat. I believe it was John Adams who defined an aristocrat as he who controls more than one vote. Get out and talk to your neighbors. Get them to go vote, and educate them so that they can vote correctly. Stand for freedom. Stand for the Constitution, before Obama, who took an OATH to defend it, rips it to shreds before our eyes. I have stood in the Archive Rotunda. It is real to me, and so are each one of you.

23 March 2009

Bonusgate Scandal

Share
Some people seem shocked that I’m not bothered by Bonusgate. What bothers me most is not how AIG pisses away $165 million but how the Obama Administration under the guise of fairness will piss away $10 trillion. AIG will “waste” about 1/10th of 1% of what Obama proposes to waste through fraud and abuse.

My last employer gave bonuses for performance. Although we earned a competitive and fair wage for our hourly employ, certain work benchmarks were designed to allow us opportunity to share in the profits of our labor. However, due to mismanagement, it inevitably ended that we, the hourly workers, rarely if ever received tuppence for our work. Rest assured management pocketed their bonuses. That’s probably partly why they refused to promote me (because they’d have to replace their #1 hourly worker and take a lower bonus) and refused to fire me when I spoke up to bad leadership. However, their neglect of my concerns, which were shared among the general working body, kept us inexorably in a position where due to accidents, training, damages, and the like we never qualified for a bonus.

Relatively soon after I left, but not necessarily due to my official letter of resignation, the home office terminated the general manager, who had been with the company for seven years. The organization had languished with problems in turnover and productivity, and although I had nothing against D.P., since he bears ultimate responsibility, they replaced him. I hope things are looking up, but I doubt it. The 600 of us they hired were the top 1% of applicants, and many of those they hired were no prize. If they don’t do something to reward the people who get the job done, ultimately this locale if not the corporation entire will fold under the weight of incompetence in high echelons.

In a privately run organization dependent on customers who purchase products to furnish monies to the operating costs of a company, the manipulation of a bonus system can only go so far before the assets of the company fold and it collapses like a house of cards. The reason why I worry more about government is that its revenue stream depends not on the quality of the goods and services it produces but upon the size of its population and the industry of each individual therein. Under a government that awards bonuses and pelf on false pretenses, it can collapse only when the people are so wasted that there remains no product of labor to bequeath to each feudal vassal or that the people rebel there against and overthrow the government. Business poorly run eventually collapses under the weight of mismanagement. Governments poorly run can only be overthrown in exchange for the lifeblood of their people. When that sad moment comes, the most vibrant and productive members of society will be spent in heaps upon the ground, their potential gone, their lifeblood useful for nothing more than fertilizer upon ground in which to hopefully plant a successful subsequent attempt.

When my employer cited me for “insubordination”, I told my manager that the only recourse remaining to me was to leave the organization. When I left, the general manager asked me what he could do to change my mind and keep me. I told him, “You should have been doing it for the last year.” I have never been easily replaceable. Not many people will give 130% as a RULE for 100% of the pay, and Americans sure as shooting will not invest 200% the effort to keep society working for the drones and losers who constantly gripe about apparent slights and wouldn’t lift a finger to get the job done. They “deserve” nothing. They drag down our entire society. I don’t know what the people at AIG did to get bonuses, but I know that sometimes deserving people receive them and that also sometimes deserving people get shafted.

In Tolkien’s novel, Gandalf responds to Frodo’s objection that life isn’t fair with this statement, “Many that live deserve death. Many that die deserve life. Will you give it to them?” IT is not for us to be fair and equal. It is for us to be JUST. Justice in the end demands that the laws be followed. Obama would do well to remember that.

God’s justice will be done.

21 March 2009

Searching for Truth in Science

Share
A few weeks ago, one of my students stayed after we were done with the day's activities to ask me some questions. She had caught hold rightly of the impression that I don't think much of most scientists. I spend time during the first or second lab period of every section instilling a healthy dose of skepticism into them about science, scientists, and the scientific method, and she wanted some advice per se.

That particular week, I had handed them back the workbooks and pointed out a particularly poignant way in which a student, novice that he is in science, worded his conclusion. At the end, he noted, "We accept it for now", a concession that given the small sample size and limited means of measure it could hardly be extrapolated to be the rule in every case on every scale under every condition, and I wanted them to see it done correctly.

Much of science is ego. Everyone wants to publish this or that and win fame and fortune and accolades. In the process however this very attitude makes of us all enemies and discourages cooperation and collaboration since we basically descend to the state at which we pursue cutthroat competition in a hasty effort to beat others to the punch. Such is the sentiment expressed by James Watson, Nobel Prize in Chemistry for the Structure of DNA, in this statement from his own account of the aforementioned endeavor:
A goodly number of scientists are not only narrow-minded and dull but also just stupid.

This man recently lost his Nobel Prize for a "racially insensitive remark". What he actually said was this about the African race:
"All our social policies are based on the fact that their intelligence is the same as ours - whereas all the testing says not really"


We have built a societal norm on sameness because that's what we want it to be. We don't want pain or differences or struggle. We want to be the same, regardless of the truth. In her novel "The Giver", Lois Lowry addresses that this choice to ablate the obvious fact of the matter is to do the greatest injustice intelligent beings can do to one another- lie. All the claims are lies, and scientists, who themselves excel thereat, complicit in that campaign ignore the truth in order to avoid pain.

Fact of the matter is that the truth is sometimes painful. Just because a man has a PhD or an MD doesn't make him smarter than you. Just because he's published papers doesn't mean he's right. After all, Francis and Pauling thought genes were made of proteins and not DNA.

Scientists have an agenda- they want to be right, even if they're dead wrong. Do you want that kind of a physician caring for you- one who'd rather think he's right because we awarded him high marks or one who really is right because he paid the price for greatness? Dr. Watson is a brave man. In this way at least, he is to us a Giver.

20 March 2009

Homebuying 201

Share
I'm looking for my second home but this time I'll be buying a certified pre-owned home aka a foreclosure. It's been a singularly interesting experience.

The agent to which I was assigned used to sell new homes and as such has never done a resale, let alone a bank foreclosure. She was very kind but very novice, remarking at one point that a particular home needed a lot of work. She even took me out to lunch. I've never had a girl pay for a meal before, and it was quite interesting ;)

I learned a lot. People took a lot of things with them when they lost their homes, and some people described their homes in interesting ways. One of the most important things was leverage: there are so many homes for grabs in the area that I have quite a bit of bargaining power depending on how desperate the bank is.

I found two homes I particularly like and took my parents back to see them. One is basically a plug and play with very room left for change and the other will need a lot of work on the yard but has much more in the way of possibilities. Neither home was as nice as the one my parents own now, but both seemed better to me than ones we've owned previously.


No matter what I pick, a resale foreclosure will need work. I guess I don't really mind that; it will give me something productive to do.
The two homes I like the most so far:
Updated 23 March
But not in particular order.