People seem
confused at what liberalism actually means and why anyone would oppose it. Liberalism, at its core, is anti-liberty and
authoritarian. It relies on logical
fallacies, ad populum and ad hoc ergo proctor hoc and quid pro quo to survive and thrive. Liberalism, like its predecessor Feudalism,
attracts the arrogant, vain, and selfish while managing to justify its
existence by claiming its opponents are thus.
While claiming a meritocracy, liberalism only believes in merit when its
people are advanced. While defending
democracy, liberals only believe in it when the people vote for what liberals
believe. Liberalism crosses party lines
because liberals share one facet in common: they prefer their own and detest
any others. Most liberals are united by
one great ethic- the pursuit of power.
Indeed, some liberal characters in fiction proudly declare “There is no
good and evil, only power and those too weak to seek it.” It’s a very condescending point of view, but
it is also pervasive. It’s the easy
way. A liberal demands to be judged on
his intentions while judging you on your actions. A liberal believes that the ends always
justify the means as a pretense to do whatever the liberal desires even if the
liberal takes different sides of an issue for expediency. Liberalism
persists because they “clothe their naked villainy with odd old ends stol’n
forth from holy writ and seem saints when most they play the devil” (Richard
III). Essentially, when you get down to brass tacks,
liberalism is the philosophy of hell, the doctrine preached by the father of
all lies, and just as it captured the devils that follow Lucifer and millions
of humans in the years before us, it appeals to the minds of many in our day
because it’s easy.
Liberals are
adroit at pretense and pretending.
Rather than spend money on education, let’s just arrange to have
everyone elected to public office, which obviously makes every liberal an
expert on every subject. Once in office,
liberals act like mini tyrants and demand that you live your principles and if
they can they demand that you live theirs as well. They like to pretend to hate the rich and
want to redistribute for the poor, but if you look at the Forbes list, eight of
the ten richest people in America are liberals, and the companies they run
reach into almost every American home, preaching liberalism. Amazon, Facebook, Twitter, etc., are all
liberal companies, and so our calamity is heightened by reflection that we furnish
the means by which we suffer. We support
liberal companies with our purchases and then wonder why liberalism spreads. Liberals claim to be for blacks and for women
and lash out when their blacks and their women are roasted, but when Clarence
Thomas and Sarah Palin come under vicious slander and libel, the silence of
liberals is deafening. In recent weeks
with sexual misconduct on the radar, black people in Conyers’ district demanded
due process after accusations arose, but none of those people demanded due
process for Roy Moore.
In order to be
a successful liberal politician, you must in essence endorse and be a fraud. At some point in the last 40 years, the
democrats managed to convince a large fraction of the electorate that they were
for freedom, the little guy, the minority, and the oppressed. Electing a republican will bring back
segregation. Race baiting to defeat Roy
Moore was way over the top, especially when you consider that the Congressional
records show that Democrats were actually in favor and defenders of slavery and
its associated aftershocks. Indeed,
Leonard Bacon warned that “If that form of
government, that system of social order is not wrong - if those laws of the
Southern States, by virtue of which slavery exists there, and is what it is,
are not wrong - nothing is wrong.”
Most liberalism came from the south, and now that they’ve moved into the
north and west with the collapse of their racist utopia in the confederacy,
they permeate the nation with the notion that “you only live once so live it up”,
that “do what you like” (unless it’s be a conservative Christian), and “whatsoever
a man doeth is no crime”. They continue
to perpetuate the lie that they are somehow oppressed. Most of the media outlets are liberal despite
what their commentators claim as political affiliation, and when liberals own
the information, they can bend it all they like. In fact, more than 90% of news coverage of Trump is negative, but the
media will claim that any conservative commentary constitutes a
disproportionate “bias”. It’s not about
bias. It’s about hegemony. It’s piratical in a sense, that they do not
care about how much swag they have as long as you have any swag below your
deck. Liberals claim to be FOR the
oppressed, always bashing the “rich” but they cleverly never include
themselves, and they redefine what rich means.
Obama talked about a family of four earning $250,000/year. How is that “millionaire”? Nobody thinks they are rich. Even one of the police officers on campus
said you can never earn too much money and he earns $83000 year as a police
officer. That’s more than an Army Major
earns. That’s probably more than you
earn. Yet, he will talk with anger about
how the “rich always get tax cuts from the republicans”, because liberals are
never rich. There’s always someone with
more money, someone with money they don’t have.
Once in office,
the liberal perpetuates fraud. Here, the
logical fallacy ad hoc ergo proctor hoc
takes place. They elected us, so we have
a mandate, but when you elect their opponents, the election is fraudulent (Bush
v Gore 2000). When it comes to science, they pick and
choose. With global warming, they say “it’s hotter than we’d like” and so it
must be YOUR fault. Coincidence is not
causality, but if you don’t believe in it, they call you a climate change
denier. IN order to keep their base drummed up, they
claim that you must elect democrats or the evil republicans will cut funding
for fire, police, and ambulance services.
Only a liberal demagogue thinks that when I say I'm for lower taxes and
less government I think that police, firemen and the like ought to be cut from
the budget. Only a complete moron jumps to that conclusion over other programs. Everything they do dehumanizes those they
oppose. Any gun crime evokes accusations
against all gun owners. Any hypocrite
Christian justifies the vilification of all Christians. This fearmongering comes after the art of Gaston: “The beast will
make off with your children. He’ll come
after them in the night. We’re not safe
until his head is mounted on my wall!”
Liberals are only responsible if the outcome is positive. Obama wasn’t responsible for rising gas
prices but was responsible for stock market gains, but Trump is not responsible
for stock market gains and is responsible for inflation. Liberalism is easy. It is the political party of “Oops!”
whereafter then they say seven Hail Marys and then they move on because it’s
resolved in their minds. It’s not just
democrats; the GOP has liberals too. When
conservatives delivered the GOP all three branches of government in 2016, the
GOP RINOs disparaged them and flipped them the bird. Too many politicians are immoral: they
promise us one thing during the election and then flip us the bird afterwards.
They promise to defend the Constitution and then eviscerate it. Yes, that
includes the GOP too and RINO Speaker Ryan who may be a pathological liar. Liberals will say anything to get elected and
then do something else afterwards; liberal democrats will promise liberalism in
the campaign and then make sure it happens, no matter what it costs. The liberal will spoon-feed you their own patented form of bullshit. Ignore
the verbiage and look
at what they're doing. What they're asking you to do. What sort of world they'd
have you build and how they're going to pay for it, because trust me, you’ll
pay.
In order to be
a liberal, you must think hypocrisy is normal and justifiable behavior (unless
your opponents are hypocrites, which is just more hypocrisy). The liberal will complain that, if Russian Olympiads
are banned for doping, nobody from America should be allowed to go either. It’s that grammar school mentality where we
all must put our heads down because of some nincompoop we don’t even know. Here, the diabolical and criminal fallacy of Quid pro quo dominates. If you want to move up in a liberal
organization or political movement or business run by liberals, you will either
have to dig dirt or lick boots. A
liberal has his friends in iniquity and the departments of government as
guards, and he tears up the laws of those who rule in righteousness so that he
can destroy those who rebel against his will.
If you do not validate them, they will not promote you over any other
candidate regardless of disparate qualifications. The nursery rhyme “Little Jack
Horner. Sat in the corner,. Eating a Christmas pie;. He put in his thumb,. And pulled out a plum,. And said, "What a good boy am I!"” references the
feudalistic practice of bribing the Lord with a “plum”. Don’t believe it? Look at what Harvey Weinstein’s accusers say
was the reason why they acquiesced to his demands- career advancement. Sexual misconduct matters only with
conservatives. In that case, allegations
is all it takes, but when evidence and accusers pile up about known liberal
politicians like Conyers, Clinton, et al., it is immediately defended. A liberal demands to be integrated only in
the moment but feel free to integrate your entire life and dig up dirt from
your past at any time as if you did it today and as if you had no remorse, made
no restitution, and paid no penalty.
They demand to be judged by intentions but judge you by any error
ever. Being a liberal means never
having to say you’re sorry unless the godfather of liberalism demands you kiss
his ring, like the kings of yesteryear.
For them, there is only one commandment.
“In fact the whole of two-faced society paid only lip service to the ten
commandments and committed adultery, stole, and cheated at cards, because,
after all, it was only the eleventh commandment that mattered—Thou Shalt Not
Get Found Out” (Marion
Chesney, The Miser of Mayfair). If you do get caught, if you’re useful, they
hold onto you, and if you’re not, like Al Franken and Conyers, then they throw
you out post haste.
The hypocrite
is fake from his core. Liberals always
go after fake issues. They demand sexual
harassment training but not the reporting of sexual harassment to law
enforcement or the resignation of their own while they demand any conservative
accused be shamed into hell. Our biggest
issues are not transgender bathrooms and the availability of free
contraceptives. Yet, obsessed with race
and sex, they talk about abortion and discrimination as if no strides were ever
taken to combat these inequities and as if they were proponents from the beginning,
which they were not, but that’s already been addressed. Liberals prop up fake heroes: how much carbon
do these psuedointelletuals emit enroute to their “climate conferences” anyway? Liberals
abound with fake outrage. Who is Senator
Gillibrand to tell us who should resign? Where was she when Mrs. Huckabee was
mocked? Sarah Palin? When did she ever condemn Bill Clinton who sexually abused
interns in the oval office? Your outrage is just the parliament jester's foist
on a somnambulent public. In order to be
a liberal, you must support fake bipartisanship: when was the last time that
Democrats caucused with Conservatives on an issue? Liberals only want bipartisanship when
conservatives join them. When Obama was
president, which Democrats broke ranks to oppose him? Liberals are fake when it comes to being
accepting, inclusive, and tolerant. Liberals demand that you accept them as they
are and then demand that you become what they find acceptable. Since everything is fake, it’s difficult to deal
with these people who are fake friends, fake allies, and fake confidants. How do you trust anyone? You live in perpetual fear, and you end up
paying the blackmail to keep it secret, usually in the form of continued
support for liberalism and its programs.
Fear becomes the ultimate tool of liberal government. Now, they will fearmonger about what the
conservatives “might” do and ignore the maladies and aftershocks caused by what
they already did. You see, socialism
just needs enough time and enough money and then panacea! They never give a timetable or an actual
itemized list of costs.
Our founding
fathers knew the risks of trusting people to govern themselves, knowing that
even those who mean to rule well may mean to rule. They warned us that if you give small men
big power and sometimes you'll pay for it and that absolute power corrupts
absolutely, yet the liberal is exactly for that- absolute power. They demand phenomenal cosmic powers and then
restrict you to itty bitty living space.
The conservative wants you to decide, to be free to fall, to flail, and
to fail. Jefferson once wrote to an
adversary that we believe in the people differently- liberals believe the
people are babies who need to be kept from hurting themselves, and
conservatives believe that in order to be adults, babies must be allowed to
walk on their own. It’s the difference
between hell and heaven- hell wants to devour you, and heaven wants you to walk
on your own. That’s why God doesn’t intervene. It would weaken you if He kept anything ill
from ever befalling you! However, it
is a standard behavior of most people to lionize their own and paint their
opponents in caricature, but you only really believe in and stand for a thing
when you fight for it when it stands to benefit people you don’t know and don’t
like. Liberals consider the Trump
administration to be immoral and unethical but if you bring up Bill Clinton’s
sexual dalliances or Barack Obama forcing religious organizations to pay for
contraceptives, they will villainize YOU.
The problem with liberalism is that liberalism promotes and glorifies in
the seven deadly sins: gluttony, lust, avarice, pride, despair, wrath, and
sloth. You are encouraged to these
particularly through the sin of envy, which leads you to demand things and
rights for nothing and at the expense of others, which does not lead to
happiness but to more problems. In fact,
the liberal doesn’t want to help society.
He does not want us to have an equal chance, an equal voice. The liberal
must justify his place as our ruler.
No comments:
Post a Comment